SB315,18,172
82.11
(1) The
town supervisors shall
meet at the time and place stated in their
3notice, and upon being satisfied that the notices required in s. 80.05 have been duly
4given, proof of which may be shown by affidavit or otherwise as they may require,
5shall proceed to examine personally
such examine the highway
, and shall hear any
6reason that may be offered for or against laying out, widening, altering or
7discontinuing the same, and shall decide upon or proposed highway that is the
8subject of an application or resolution under s. 82.10. At the time and place stated
9in the notice under s. 82.10, the town board shall hold a public hearing to decide, in
10its discretion, whether granting the application
and shall grant or refuse the same
11as they shall deem best for the public good; and they may adjourn from time to time,
12not exceeding in all 30 days from the time of the first meeting, giving public notice
13of the time and place of such adjournment when made, and by forthwith filing notice
14of such adjournment in the office of the town clerk or resolution is in the public
15interest. Before the town board holds a public hearing on or takes any action on the
16application or resolution, the town board must be satisfied, by affidavit of the
17applicant or otherwise, that the notices in s. 82.10 (4) have been given.
Note: The language from current s. 80.06 specifying how the supervisors may
adjourn for a period not exceeding 30 days was not carried into this bill because the special
committee decided that it was unnecessary.
SB315, s. 41
18Section
41. 80.07 (title) of the statutes is repealed.
SB315, s. 42
19Section
42. 80.07 (1) and (2) of the statutes are consolidated, renumbered
2082.12 (2) and amended to read:
SB315,19,1621
82.12
(2) When the supervisors If the board determines under sub. (1) to lay
22out, alter,
widen or discontinue any highway
they, it shall
make and sign an issue a
23highway order
therefor, incorporating therein a description of the highway and cause
1survey thereof to be made when necessary. The
highway order shall be
filed and 2recorded
in the office of with the register of deeds for the county in which the highway
3is or will be located and shall be filed with the town clerk
, who shall note in the record
4the time of recording. The order together with the award of damages shall be so filed
5within 10 days after the date fixed by their notice or adjournment for deciding upon
6the application. In case the supervisors fail to file the order and award within the
710 days aforesaid they shall be deemed to have decided against the application.
8When an order has been filed for more than 30 years and no award of damages or
9agreement or release has been filed and when the highway, or a part thereof, has been
10used by the public and public money has been expended thereon, for at least 5 years,
11it shall be presumed that a release was given by the owners of the lands over which
12the highway was laid out and the public shall be entitled to use the full width of the
13highway, as laid out, without further compensation. (2) Whenever the supervisors
14lay out, alter or discontinue any highway the. The town clerk shall
transmit submit 15a certified copy of the order
therefor to the county highway commissioner.
If the town
16has an official map, the order shall be incorporated into the official map.
Note: The special committee did not carry over from current s. 80.07 the following
language: "In case the supervisors fail to file the order and award within the 10 days
aforesaid, they shall be deemed to have decided against the application.". The special
committee decided that this might allow a town board to change its mind after a public
decision had been made.
SB315, s. 43
17Section
43. 80.08 of the statutes is renumbered 82.18 and amended to read:
SB315,20,2
1882.18 Width of highways. Except as
otherwise provided in
s. 80.13 this
19chapter, highways
laid out under this chapter shall be laid out at least
49.5 66 feet
20wide
, and when unless, in the town board's discretion, that width is impractical. If
21the town board determines that a 66-foot width is impractical, the width shall be
1determined by the town board but shall be at least 49.5 feet in width. When no width
2is specified in the
highway order
, the highway shall be 66 feet wide.
Note: Current law sets the minimum width at 49.5 feet. New s. 82.18 sets the
minimum width at 66 feet, however, the language also gives the board the option to lay
a narrower highway if it determines that 66 feet is impractical.
SB315, s. 44
3Section
44. 80.09 of the statutes is repealed.
SB315, s. 45
4Section
45. 80.10 of the statutes is repealed.
SB315, s. 46
5Section
46. 80.11 (title) of the statutes is renumbered 82.21 (title) and
6amended to read:
SB315,20,7
782.21 (title)
Highways on and across town
and municipal lines.
SB315, s. 47
8Section
47. 80.11 (1) of the statutes is renumbered 82.21 (1) (intro.) and
9amended to read:
SB315,20,1810
82.21
(1) Initiating the procedure. (intro.)
Whenever it is considered
11necessary The procedure to lay out, alter,
widen or discontinue a highway
upon on 12the line between
2 towns a town and another town, a city, or a village, or
a highway 13extending from one town into an adjoining town,
it shall be done by the supervisors
14of the 2 towns acting together. If the highway is laid out or altered it may be either
15upon or as near to the town line as the situation of the ground will admit. The
16supervisors of the 2 towns acting together may vary the location on either side of the
17town line as they consider to be necessary. city, or village, shall begin only when one
18of the following occurs in each affected municipality:
SB315, s. 48
19Section
48. 80.11 (2) (a) (intro.) of the statutes is renumbered 82.21 (2) and
20amended to read:
SB315,21,321
82.21
(2) Contents of the application or resolution. An application
or
22resolution under sub. (1) shall
be all of the following: contain a legal description of
23the highway to be discontinued or of the proposed highway to be laid out or altered
1and a scale map of the land that would be affected by the application. Upon
2completion of the requirements of sub. (1), the governing bodies of the municipalities,
3acting together, shall proceed under ss. 82.10 to 82.13.
SB315, s. 49
4Section
49. 80.11 (2) (a) 1. to 4., (b) and (c) of the statutes are repealed.
SB315, s. 50
5Section
50. 80.11 (3) (a), (b) 1. and 2. and (c) of the statutes are renumbered
682.21 (4) (a), (b), (c) and (d) and amended to read:
SB315,21,157
82.21
(4) (a)
The A highway order
under sub. (2) (c) issued by 2 towns or by a
8town and a city or village may designate the part of the highway that
each shall
be
9made and kept in construct and repair
by each town, and the share of, and pay the
10damages
for, if any
, that shall be paid by each town. Each town. As to the portion
11of the highway that the town, city, or village agrees to construct, keep in repair, and
12pay damages for, the town, city, or village shall have all of the
rights authority and
13be subject to
the liabilities all of the responsibility in relation to
the that part of the
14highway
to be made or repaired by it as if
it that part were wholly located in
that the 15town
, city, or village.
SB315,21,2016
(b)
A majority of the supervisors of each town
Two town boards or a town board
17and a city council or village board, meeting together, may make an order in
18accordance with par. (a) apportioning or reapportioning
the authority and
19responsibility for a town line highway or any part of
the a town line highway that
20they consider advisable, if any of the following conditions exists:
SB315,21,2221
1. No apportionment has been made in
an a highway order
laying out, altering
22or widening the highway or a part of the highway.
SB315,21,2323
2. The highway or
a part of the highway had its origin in user.
SB315,22,224
3. In the judgment of the
supervisors town boards, or the town board and the
25city council or village board, circumstances have been so altered since the last
1apportionment of the highway or part of the highway that the
current apportionment
2or reapportionment has been rendered inequitable or impracticable.
SB315,22,63
(c) An order made under
this paragraph par. (b) shall be filed
as provided in sub.
4(2) (c) with the clerk of each affected municipality and shall have the same effect as
5an
order apportionment made in connection with the original
laying out of the 6highway
order.
SB315,22,107
(d) Any written order or agreement made before August 27, 1947, by a majority
8of the supervisors of each town concerned, acting together, apportioning
, or
9reapportioning a town line highway has the same effect as though made on or after
10August 27, 1947.
SB315, s. 51
11Section
51. 80.11 (4) of the statutes is repealed.
SB315, s. 52
12Section
52. 80.11 (5) of the statutes is renumbered 82.21 (5) (a) and amended
13to read:
SB315,23,214
82.21
(5) (a) If
no agreement is reached under sub. (4) (b), or if an order laying
15out
, or altering
or widening a town line highway has not apportioned the
liability of
16the towns or village on account of authority and responsibility for the highway
, the
17supervisors of an affected town or the president of an affected village, after 10 days'
18notice of the time and place of hearing served on the clerk of each town and village
19to be affected, or if a municipality considers the current apportionment to be
20inequitable, an affected municipality may apply to the circuit judge of the county in
21which the affected
town or village municipality is located, for the appointment of 3
22commissioners to apportion the
liabilities of authority and responsibility between 23each affected
town and village on account of the town line highway municipality. The
24municipality filing the application shall serve a copy of the application on the clerk
25of each municipality to be affected. The circuit judge may set the time and place of
1the hearing before the commissioners at least 10 days after the application is filed
2with the judge.
SB315, s. 53
3Section
53. 80.11 (6) of the statutes is renumbered 82.21 (5) (b) and amended
4to read:
SB315,23,135
82.21
(5) (b) Upon
receipt of an application under
sub. (5) par. (a), the circuit
6judge shall appoint 3 residents of the county as commissioners. The commissioners
7shall, on not less than
5 10 days' notice nor more than 60 days' notice in writing to
8the clerk of each
town and village affected
municipality, apportion the
liabilities 9authority and responsibility of each affected
town and village municipality on
10account of the highway. The commissioners shall make the determination in writing
11and shall file the determination with the clerk of each
town and village affected
12municipality. The commissioners' determination
has shall have the same effect as
13an order made under sub.
(2), (3) or (4).
SB315, s. 54
14Section
54. 80.11 (7) of the statutes is renumbered 82.23 and amended to read:
SB315,23,24
1582.23 Municipal line bridges. Any Unless otherwise provided by statute or
16agreement, every highway bridge on a
highway that became a highway under s.
1780.01 (2) as a result of having been worked, that is between 2 towns, or between a
18town on one side and a city, village
, or
a town
and village on the other side, and that
19has not been assigned to either of the adjoining towns or village,
boundary shall be
20repaired and maintained by
the any adjoining
towns and village municipality in
21which the bridge is located. The cost of repairs and maintenance shall be paid by the
22adjoining
towns and village municipalities in proportion to the
last equalized 23valuation of the property in the adjoining
towns and village as equalized by the
24county board or boards at the last equalization municipalities.
SB315, s. 55
25Section
55. 80.11 (8) of the statutes is repealed.
SB315, s. 56
1Section
56. 80.12 (title) of the statutes is repealed.
SB315, s. 57
2Section
57. 80.12 (1) of the statutes is repealed.
SB315, s. 58
3Section
58. 80.12 (2) of the statutes is renumbered 82.21 (3) and amended to
4read:
SB315,24,115
82.21
(3) Appointment of city or village commissioners. Upon receipt of an
6application
under sub. (1), the common or introduction of a resolution, the city 7council or
village board
of trustees shall may appoint 3 commissioners
on the part 8to act on behalf of the affected city or village
in all respects. The commissioners shall
9be duly sworn to faithfully discharge their duties as commissioners before entering
10upon those duties.
The commissioners and town supervisors shall then give notice
11and proceed in all respects as provided in s. 80.11.
SB315, s. 59
12Section
59. 80.12 (3) and (4) of the statutes are repealed.
SB315, s. 60
13Section
60. 80.12 (5) of the statutes is renumbered 82.21 (6) and amended to
14read:
SB315,24,1915
82.21
(6) Where papers filed. All
proceedings and orders awards, notices, and
16papers required to be filed
and recorded shall be filed
and recorded in the office of the
17clerk of
the each affected
city, village or town municipality. Any highway orders
18issued under this section shall be recorded with the register of deeds for any county
19in which the highway is or will be located.
Note: Section 82.21 is based on current ss. 80.11 (1) through (6) and 80.12. Current
s. 80.12 is ambiguous as to whether the procedure in that section is the exclusive
procedure for laying, altering, or discontinuing a highway on the line between a town and
a city or village, or whether it merely provides a means to allow citizens to petition their
municipal governments. The special committee decided to resolve the ambiguity in favor
of making the provision the exclusive means. In addition, the special committee allowed
the governing body of each municipality to initiate the procedures in different manners.
The special committee decided not to carryover current s. 80.11 (4) which vacated
an apportionment in certain situations. The special committee decided that current s.
80.11 (4) was unnecessary and could cause a gap in the responsibility for a highway. Any
reapportionment that is necessary should be covered under the provision allowing a
reapportionment in situations where the current apportionment is judged to be
inequitable or impracticable. However, the special committee changed the language to
allow one municipality to petition the court for reapportionment if that municipality feels
the current apportionment is inequitable. The appealing municipality must serve a copy
of the application on any affected municipality.
The following language from s. 80.11 (1) was not carried over to this bill because
the special committee decided it was unnecessary: "If the highway is laid out or altered,
it may be either upon or as near to the town line as the situation of the ground will admit.
The supervisors of the 2 towns acting together may vary the location on either side of the
town line as they consider to be necessary.".
Current s. 80.12 (4) was entirely deleted because the committee decided it was
unnecessary. Current s. 80.12 (4) reads as follows: "The municipalities responsible for
a municipal line highway may cause any municipal line highway or part of a municipal
line highway that is not less than 264 feet in length, to be graded, paved, macadamized
or otherwise improved, including the establishment of the grade, construction of curbs
and gutters and installation of water and sewer mains and service pipes. The
municipalities may levy special assessments for the whole or any part of the cost of the
improvements as a tax upon the property that they determine is especially benefited by
the improvements initiated under this subsection, in the manner provided in s. 66.0703.".
The new s. 82.21 changes the obligation of a city or village to appoint
commissioners from mandatory to permissive.
SB315, s. 61
1Section
61. 80.125 of the statutes is renumbered 82.28 and amended to read:
SB315,25,9
282.28 Highways and bridges on state boundaries. A town or county The 3board of any town or county
that is bounded in part by a river
, or
by a highway
, either
4of which that is also a state boundary line may enter into
an agreement with
the
any 5adjoining municipality
or county in
such the other state for the maintenance
and
, 6construction
, and reconstruction of boundary line
highways and bridges
and for the
7maintenance and reconstruction of any boundary line highway including its bridges,
8by appropriation therefor not exceeding 50% of the total costs assignable to the
9boundary line facility. The costs shall be apportioned by agreement.
Note: The current law seems to limit the town or county to paying 50% of the costs.
The special committee decided that it would be more appropriate to allow the local
government to decide how much it is willing to pay. Thus, the new s. 82.28 states that
the apportionment shall be by agreement.
SB315, s. 62
10Section
62. 80.13 (title) of the statutes is repealed.
SB315, s. 63
11Section
63. 80.13 (1) of the statutes is renumbered 82.27 (3) and amended to
12read:
SB315,26,7
182.27
(3) Setting the hearing date; notice. When any person presents the
2town board with an affidavit that meets the requirements Upon receipt of an
3application under sub.
(1m) (2), the town board shall set a time and place to conduct
4a hearing regarding the
laying out or widening of a highway application. The
5hearing shall be held after 10 days and within 30 days of the receipt of the
affidavit 6application by the town board. Notice of the time and place of the hearing shall be
7served as required by s.
80.05 82.10 and published as a class 2 notice under ch. 985.
SB315, s. 64
8Section
64. 80.13 (1m) of the statutes is renumbered 82.27 (2) and amended
9to read:
SB315,26,1710
82.27
(2) Application. The
affidavit required under sub. (1) shall be executed
11by the owner
or lessee of real estate located within
the a town
,
may apply to the town
12board to have a highway laid out to the owner's land. Except as provided in sub. (7),
13the application shall be delivered to the town clerk of the town in which the real
14estate is located. The application shall contain
a description of an affidavit, executed
15by the applicant, that describes the affected real estate and
shall contain recites facts
16that satisfy the
supervisors board that
any of the
following circumstances
exists 17either in par. (a) or in par. (b) exist:
SB315,26,2318
(a) The real estate
described in the affidavit is shut out from all public highways
19by being surrounded
on all sides by real estate owned by other persons, or by real
20estate owned by other persons and by water, and that the owner
or lessee is unable
21to purchase a right-of-way to a public highway from the owners of the adjoining real
22estate or that such a right-of-way cannot be purchased except at an exorbitant price,
23which price shall be stated in the affidavit.
SB315,27,224
(b) 1. The owner
or lessee is the owner of a private way or road, whose width
25shall be stated in the affidavit, that leads from the described real estate to a public
1highway but the way or road is too narrow to afford the owner
or lessee reasonable
2access from the described real estate to the public highway; and
SB315,27,73
2. The owner
or lessee is unable to purchase a right-of-way from the described
4real estate to a public highway, or is unable to purchase land on either or both sides
5of the
owner's or lessee's existing way or road to make the way or road of sufficient
6width or that the right-of-way or additional land cannot be purchased except at an
7exorbitant price, which price shall be stated in the affidavit.
SB315, s. 65
8Section
65. 80.13 (3) of the statutes is renumbered 82.27 (4) and amended to
9read:
SB315,27,2010
82.27
(4) Hearing. (a) The town board shall meet at the time and place stated
11in the notice
given under sub. (1) and shall in their
and decide, in its discretion
lay
12out a highway of not less than 33 feet nor more than 49.5 feet in width from the public
13highway to the real estate described in the affidavit under sub. (1m) (a) or (b) either
14by, whether to grant the application. The board may grant the application by either 15laying out a new highway across the surrounding land or by adding
enough land to
16the width of the existing way or road described in the affidavit
under sub. (1m) (b)
17to make it. If the board decides to lay out a new highway, the new highway shall be
18at least 66 feet wide unless the board determines this width to be impracticable. If
19the board decides to widen an existing way or road, the resulting highway shall not
20be less than
33 49.5 feet nor more than
49.5 66 feet in width.
SB315,27,2521
(b) The town board shall
assess determine the damages to the owner or owners
22of the real estate
over or through on which the highway shall be laid
out or from whom
23land shall be taken and the advantages to the applicant. The town board may not
24assess determine damages in
any an amount exceeding the price stated in the
25affidavit of the applicant.
SB315, s. 66
1Section
66. 80.13 (4) of the statutes is renumbered 82.27 (4) (c) and amended
2to read:
SB315,28,123
82.27
(4) (c) Upon laying out a highway
under sub. (3) or widening a private
4way or road, the town board shall
make and sign an
issue a highway order
describing
5the laid out highway and. If it is necessary to include a turnaround, the turnaround
6shall be laid out on the applicant's land. The applicant shall pay the town treasurer
7the amount determined as advantages within 30 days of the board's decision. Within
810 days of payment, the town board shall file the order with the town clerk
together
9with its award of damages. The and record the order
shall be recorded by the clerk;
10provided, that the amount assessed as advantages to the applicant under sub. (3) is
11paid to the town treasurer before the order laying out such highway shall be filed 12with the register of deeds for the county in which the land is located.
SB315, s. 67
13Section
67. 80.13 (4m) of the statutes is renumbered 82.27 (5) and amended
14to read:
SB315,28,1915
82.27
(5) Charging costs to the applicant. The following costs may be
16assessed If the town board grants the application, the items listed in pars. (a) to (d)
17may be included in the determination of advantages. If the town board denies the
18application, 50 percent of all of the following may be charged to the applicant
as a
19special charge under s. 66.0627:
SB315,28,2020
(a) Attorney fees reasonably incurred by the town
under subs. (3) and (4).
SB315,28,2221
(b) The cost of any survey or
the fee of any expert on valuation, or both,
22reasonably incurred by the town
under subs. (3) and (4).
SB315, s. 68
23Section
68. 80.13 (5) of the statutes is renumbered 82.27 (6) and amended to
24read:
SB315,29,14
182.27
(6) Real estate landlocked by sale. Whenever a parcel In a town, if the
2owner of land
in any town which that is accessible
, or
that is provided with
a
3right-of-way an easement to a public highway
, is subdivided and the owner 4subdivides and transfers any part of the
subdivided parcel by metes and bounds that
5would otherwise be shut out from all public highways by reason of being surrounded
6on all sides by real estate belonging to other persons or by real estate belonging to
7other persons and by water without an adequate right-of-way to a public highway,
8the seller land, the owner shall provide a cleared
right-of-way easement at least
50 966 feet in width that shall be continuous from the highway to the part of the
10subdivision sold.
In case If the seller fails to provide the required
right-of-way 11easement, the town board may, pursuant to proceedings under this section, lay out
12a road
at least 66 feet wide from the inaccessible land to the public highway over the
13remaining lands of the seller without assessment of damages or compensation to the
14seller.
SB315, s. 69
15Section
69. 80.14 of the statutes is renumbered 82.27 (7) and amended to read:
SB315,30,1416
82.27
(7) Highway from shut-off land through Laying out a highway to an
17adjoining town. When the owner of land that is shut out from all highways by being
18surrounded by lands belonging to other persons, and If it is impracticable to lay out
19a
road from that owner's land to a public highway to an existing highway
that is 20in the town where the land is situated,
and it is practicable to lay out a highway from
21said land a landowner may apply to have a highway laid out to a highway in an
22adjoining town
, that owner may.
The application shall comply with the requirements
23of sub. (2), except that the affidavit shall also state that it is impracticable to lay out
24a new highway to an existing highway in the town where the land is located and that
25it is practicable to lay out a highway to an existing highway in the adjoining town.
1The owner shall execute
an affidavit
the application in duplicate and present one
2copy to
a supervisor the clerk of the town where the land is
situated located and one
3copy to
a supervisor the clerk of the town where the proposed highway is to be laid
4out. The
affidavit shall set forth the facts above stated, together with the facts
5required in the affidavit provided under s. 80.13. The supervisors of the 2 towns town
6boards shall proceed as provided
under said s. 80.13 in this section, except that all
7orders and notices shall be signed by
the supervisors of both
boards, and all papers
8required to be filed shall be made in duplicate and filed with each town clerk. The
9applicant shall pay the amount
assessed determined as advantages
to the applicant
10shall be paid by the applicant to the
town treasurer of the town
where in which the
11applicant's land is situated
before the order laying out the highway is filed, and all 12within 30 days of the decision. The order shall be recorded within 10 days of
13payment. All damages assessed shall be paid by the town where the
applicant's land
14of the applicant is situated.
SB315, s. 70
15Section
70. 80.15 (title) of the statutes is renumbered 82.27 (8) (title).
SB315, s. 71
16Section
71. 80.15 of the statutes is renumbered 82.27 (8) (a) and amended to
17read:
SB315,30,2318
82.27
(8) (a) The owner of an island in the bottoms of the Mississippi River
19which may submit an application under this section if the island is shut out from the
20bank of
said the river and from
a all highway
access by islands
and, sloughs
, and
21by the lands of others, and
a right-of-way through the same cannot be purchased 22the owner cannot purchase any highway access at a reasonable price
, may present
23to the supervisors of the town.
SB315,31,2
24(b) The application shall describe the affected land and shall contain an
25affidavit
setting forth such that recites the facts
and describing that owner's land.
1The said supervisors shall then proceed according to the provisions of s. 80.13 and
2the provisions of said section shall apply to proceedings under this section. in par. (a).
SB315,31,5
3(c) The town shall not be liable for
want lack of repair or for defects in
any
a 4highway laid out pursuant to this
section subsection, nor
shall the town be liable for
5any accident or injury
thereon on a highway laid out under this subsection.
Note: Section 82.27 (1) through (7) is based on current ss. 80.13 and 80.14.
In s. 82.27 (4) (c), there is new language specifying that a turnaround, if necessary,
should be constructed on the applicant's land. The special committee decided that this
was a fair way to distribute the displacement of the highway. Since the applicant's land
is primarily being benefited, the special committee felt it would be unfair to the
landowner whose land is being taken, to construct a turnaround on the taken land as well.
In s. 82.27 (3), the width of roads has been changed. Current s. 80.13 (3) (a) requires
the road to be between 33 and 49.5 feet wide. New s. 82.27 (4) requires a newly laid out
road to be at least 66 feet wide.
In s. 82.27 (5), administrative costs and per diems were added as costs that could
be charged to the applicant, and the language was changed to allow only half of these costs
to be charged to the applicant when the application is refused.
Section 82.27 (7) and (8) (c) add a time requirement for when the applicant must
pay the advantages. Current ss. 80.13 (4) and 80.14 only require the applicant to pay the
amount determined as advantages before the order is filed. Current s. 80.07 (1) states
that a failure to file an order within 10 days of the board's decision is deemed a refusal
of the application. In Northern States Power Company v. Town of Hunter, 57 Wis. 2d 118,
the Wisconsin Supreme Court stated that the 10-day limitation should apply to s. 80.14
to prevent the landowner whose land is taken from being in limbo as to whether the land
would actually be taken. Since the special committee deleted the 10-day limitation in
current s. 80.07 (1), the special committee decided there needed to be a time limit in new
s. 82.27 (7) and (9) (c). New s. 82.27 requires the applicant to pay the advantages within
30 days; the order shall be recorded within 10 days of payment.
Section 82.27 (8) is based on current s. 80.15. No substantive change is intended.
SB315, s. 72
6Section
72. 80.16 of the statutes is renumbered 82.13 and amended to read:
SB315,32,2
782.13 Shut-off Highways to school buildings; how laid.
Whenever Upon
8being notified that a public school in
any a town
is shut off from all public highways 9lacks highway access, the
supervisors of the town
board shall lay out a highway to
10the
site thereof public school, using the procedures in this subchapter. No
11application for
such the highway shall be necessary
, but in every other respect the
12procedure for laying out an ordinary town highway shall be pursued. No highway
13shall be discontinued when the effect of such discontinuance shall be to exclude a
1public school from access to the public highways. Section
80.22 82.12 (3) shall not
2apply to proceedings under this section.
SB315, s. 73
3Section
73. 80.17 (title) of the statutes is repealed.
SB315, s. 74
4Section
74. 80.17 of the statutes is renumbered 82.12 (1) and amended to read:
SB315,32,135
82.12
(1) Any order of the town supervisors laying out, altering, widening or
6discontinuing any highway, or refusing so to do, is subject to judicial review under
7s. 68.13, except that only a person aggrieved by the order or determination may seek
8review. Failure of the supervisors to file their decision upon
A town board shall make
9a determination upon any application
or resolution to lay out, alter,
widen or
10discontinue any highway within
60 90 days after
receipt of the application
is made
11shall be deemed a refusal of the application. In case of highways upon a line between
122 counties the appeal may be made to the circuit court of either county or introduction
13of a resolution.
SB315, s. 75
14Section
75. 80.22 (title) of the statutes is repealed.
SB315, s. 76
15Section
76. 80.22 of the statutes is renumbered 82.12 (3) and amended to read:
SB315,32,2216
82.12
(3) The determination
refusing to lay out, alter, widen or discontinue any 17not to issue a highway
order shall be final
, unless appealed from, for
the term of one
18year
after the making of such determination; and no other
. No application
for laying
19out, widening, altering or discontinuing any such to lay out, alter, or discontinue a 20highway shall be
acted upon filed within
said term of one year
from the date of a
21determination not to issue a highway order covering the highway or portion of the
22highway covered in the refused application.